Advanced Functions and Closures
This section explores some advanced features related to functions and closures, including function pointers and returning closures.
Function Pointers
We’ve talked about how to pass closures to functions; you can also pass regular functions to functions!
This technique is useful when you want to pass a function you’ve already defined rather than defining a new closure.
- Functions coerce to the type
fn
(with a lowercase f), not to be confused with theFn
closure trait. - The
fn
type is called a function pointer. - Passing functions with function pointers will allow you to use functions as arguments to other functions.
The syntax for specifying that a parameter is a function pointer is similar to that of closures, as shown in Listing 19-27, where we’ve defined a function
add_one
that adds one to its parameter.
- The function
do_twice
takes two parameters: a function pointer to any function that takes ani32
parameter and returns ani32
, and onei32 value
. - The
do_twice
function calls the functionf
twice, passing it thearg
value, then adds the two function call results together. - The
main
function callsdo_twice
with the argumentsadd_one
and5
.
Filename: src/main.rs
fn add_one(x: i32) -> i32 {
x + 1
}
fn do_twice(f: fn(i32) -> i32, arg: i32) -> i32 {
f(arg) + f(arg)
}
fn main() {
let answer = do_twice(add_one, 5);
println!("The answer is: {}", answer);
}
Listing 19-27: Using the fn
type to accept a function
pointer as an argument
- This code prints
The answer is: 12
. - We specify that the parameter
f
indo_twice
is anfn
that takes one parameter of typei32
and returns ani32
. - We can then call
f
in the body ofdo_twice
. Inmain
, we can pass the function nameadd_one
as the first argument todo_twice
.
Unlike closures,
fn
is a type rather than a trait, so we specifyfn
as the parameter type directly rather than declaring a generic type parameter with one of theFn
traits as a trait bound.
- Function pointers implement all three of the closure traits (
Fn
,FnMut
, andFnOnce
), meaning you can always pass a function pointer as an argument for a function that expects a closure. - It’s best to write functions using a generic type and one of the closure traits so your functions can accept either functions or closures.
That said, one example of where you would want to only accept
fn
and not closures is when interfacing with external code that doesn’t have closures: C functions can accept functions as arguments, but C doesn’t have closures.
As an example of where you could use either a closure defined inline or a named
function, let’s look at a use of the map
method provided by the Iterator
trait in the standard library.
To use the
map
function to turn a vector of numbers into a vector of strings, we could use a closure, like this:
fn main() {
let list_of_numbers = vec![1, 2, 3];
let list_of_strings: Vec<String> =
list_of_numbers.iter().map(|i| i.to_string()).collect();
}
Or we could name a function as the argument to map
instead of the closure,
like this:
fn main() {
let list_of_numbers = vec![1, 2, 3];
let list_of_strings: Vec<String> =
list_of_numbers.iter().map(ToString::to_string).collect();
}
Note that we must use the
fully qualified syntax
that we talked about earlier in the “Advanced Traits” section because there are multiple functions available namedto_string
.
Here, we’re using the
to_string
function defined in the ToString
trait, which the standard
library has implemented for any type that implements Display
.
Recall from the “Enum values” section of Chapter 6 that the name of each enum variant that we define also becomes an initializer function.
We can use these initializer functions as function pointers that implement the closure traits, which means we can specify the initializer functions as arguments for methods that take closures, like so:
fn main() {
enum Status {
Value(u32),
Stop,
}
let list_of_statuses: Vec<Status> = (0u32..20).map(Status::Value).collect();
}
-
Here we create
Status::Value
instances using eachu32
value in the range thatmap
is called on by using the initializer function ofStatus::Value
. -
Some people prefer this style, and some people prefer to use closures. They compile to the same code, so use whichever style is clearer to you.
Returning Closures
Closures are represented by traits, which means you can’t return closures directly. In most cases where you might want to return a trait, you can instead use the concrete type that implements the trait as the return value of the function.
However, you can’t do that with closures because they don’t have a concrete type that is returnable; you’re not allowed to use the function pointer
fn
as a return type, for example.
The following code tries to return a closure directly, but it won’t compile:
fn returns_closure() -> dyn Fn(i32) -> i32 {
|x| x + 1
}
The compiler error is as follows:
$ cargo build
Compiling functions-example v0.1.0 (file:///projects/functions-example)
error[E0746]: return type cannot have an unboxed trait object
--> src/lib.rs:1:25
|
1 | fn returns_closure() -> dyn Fn(i32) -> i32 {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
|
= note: for information on `impl Trait`, see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-02-traits.html#returning-types-that-implement-traits>
help: use `impl Fn(i32) -> i32` as the return type, as all return paths are of type `[closure@src/lib.rs:2:5: 2:14]`, which implements `Fn(i32) -> i32`
|
1 | fn returns_closure() -> impl Fn(i32) -> i32 {
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0746`.
error: could not compile `functions-example` due to previous error
The error references the
Sized
trait again!
Rust doesn’t know how much space it will need to store the closure. We saw a solution to this problem earlier. We can use a trait object:
fn returns_closure() -> Box<dyn Fn(i32) -> i32> {
Box::new(|x| x + 1)
}
This code will compile just fine. For more about trait objects, refer to the section “Using Trait Objects That Allow for Values of Different Types” in Chapter 17.
Next, let’s look at macros!